There are some complaints concerning lack of eQSL.cc support. To my best knowledge, CQRLOG can be used with eQSL.cc, however it seems a bit risky to introduce another option which will be considered as 'confirmed'. Now, the confirmation methods uses 'Q' for contacts confirmed with usual paper QSL and 'L' for LoTW confirmations. There is also possible to choose 'Confirmed only' stats for the usual (paper) way, 'LoTW only' for contacts confirmed exclusively via LoTW and both methods together. Of course, a third method can be introduced (say 'E' for eQSL.cc) with corresponding selections for stats, however there is another problem - should we introduce also 'E+L' for both LoTW and eQSL together? And what about 'E+L+confirmed', to gather all known confirmation methods? And what we should do if somebody comes with another confirmation method (there is actually no guarantee that a national organization will not start their own electronic QSL project which will ignore both existing LoTW ans eQSL...)?
We suggest to consider and discuss all possibilities, with primary aim to find the simplest and most flexible way to determine what 'confirmed' should actually mean.